« harpo's bid for power | Main | andy burnham's mistake »

January 18, 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Charlesbarry

If I recall correctly, Reagan left office in Jan 1989. The Soviet Union collapsed fully only in the later half of 1991.

Ian Leslie

Yes, good point - I wasn't clear. I've amended. Thanks Charles.

John

Come on. Hendrik Hertzberg is hardly neutral. He was a speechwriter for Jimmy Carter (a genuinely hopeless president).

Ian Leslie

I never said or implied the author of that passage is neutral or disinterested. I just like the passage, because it nicely illustrates something I believe to be true of Reagan: that he was largely a passive figure, on which people projected - and project - their wishes.

Lyle

Ron Reagan is hardly neutral either. And yet he and Hertzberg seem to share similar observations about the GIpper's mien while Prez, at least during his second term.

domain name hosting

Reagan has an excellent and also experience.. Thanks for sharing your experience in that period..

Dave Weeden

I'm late to this party, but why is Carter a "genuinely hopeless President"? I thought that historians now agreed that it was the provocation of Afghanistan in 1979 that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. While it was Reagan who capitulated to the Iranian hostage crisis. Or am I wrong?

Oh and the comment above mine is spam.

Here

Now, just pay the set amount unless they state they under-estimated a bit and are not demanding about it.

The comments to this entry are closed.

brain food

american politics

british politics

diversions

my other places

ads