Barack Obama managed to do the impossible yesterday: delight independents, commentators and his base (and even a few Republicans).He was invited to speak to a gathering of the Republican congressional caucus, and accepted. That's not unprecedented. What is, is that after a twenty-minute speech he took questions from his audience for an hour, whilst the camera rolled. Independent observers loved the unscripted, dramatic nature of the encounter, and the extraordinary fact that for most of the time the participants were courteously discussing actual policies, like grown-ups and everything. The Dem base was delighted because Obama, whilst civil, gave some of his questioners a pretty hard time. And just about everyone agreed that this was the president at his best - fluent, commanding, persuasive, charming, and the best-informed person in the room. Comments across the blogs and newspapers have been almost universally positive, almost giddy. Is this is what politics could be like?! We'll see - perhaps this will herald a real, enduring change of tone. Or perhaps it will be remembered as like the football match between British and German troops, before each tribe returned to their trenches and the guns resumed their fire.
Indeed, this has been described as almost unprecedented. In my mind, what's equally important is the presence of the press. Each party's spin (and the reactions of the "opposition") is visible for the first time since the electoral debates, really. But now the stakes are completely different.
Posted by: SAJ | January 31, 2010 at 05:41 AM
I gave some money to Obama's campaign in 2007 and 2008. With this appearance, I received a rich dividend. I am so proud of the president and pleased with the House Republican Caucus for inviting him.
Beneath the policy specifics, Obama was asking the Republicans to tether their proposals to reality, to stop trying to scare the public about every Democratic (they would say "Democrat") idea, and to cease opposing ideas they once supported, simply because they come from Obama. I don't expect that plea to work directly. I don't expect many GOP Reps left the meeting thinking they would now give Obama's ideas a fairer hearing. But Obama may have shifted the political debate in his favor. More people may come to see the GOP as intransigent, as relying on scare tactics, and as lacking in sound policy ideas. I think Obama helped himself mightily, even if he didn't change a single mind in that room in Baltimore.
A secondary question -- It seems the House Republicans feel that it's Nancy Pelosi who's the intransigent one. Is she really more partisan than past speakers, such as Newt Gingrich? What's that about?
Posted by: Hal | January 31, 2010 at 12:54 PM
From where I'm sitting I get the impression that Pelosi combines a fiercely partisan attitude with incredible tenacity and relentlessness as a vote-whipper (much more than Newt I imagine...?). That is bound to make her unpopular with the other side (and some on her own side). She's not a great public face for the Dems and she and Obama disagree on much politically and differ in attitude to politics...but she's a highly effective whip which makes her pretty indispensable. She's a very useful bad cop. Although that she's so necessary probably tells you something about the state of Washington these days.
Posted by: Marbury | February 01, 2010 at 09:22 AM
That's the man I voted for!
Posted by: cat | February 01, 2010 at 10:01 AM
I hope reporting of this went beyond the political junkie sphere so that John Q Citizen has a chance to see!
Posted by: Lyle | February 01, 2010 at 01:44 PM