« prematurity - or why it's sometimes best to seize the day after today | Main | in his mind, he's still running »

June 15, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5500eaa97883401538f344108970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference a good night for mitt and michele :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ejoch

I watched, half expected it to be dreadful but was quite watchable. Romney was very good, whereas Pawlenty was annoying on many levels- one of which was, he came across like a man trying to play a part (badly). And even when he did that, he was shrill and irritating.
I was surprised by Bachmann- read a lot about her but never heard her speak. Very impressive in a debate, not a Palin. I can't see how she can tack centre convincingly enough to be electable though.

It's a pity they all had to be so careful about bringing any nuance in- one commentator said they were all terrified of annoying the tea party by doing so. But I guess one shouldn't expect nuance in these things anyway.

Marbury

Thanks. I'd just add that tacking to the centre will obviously only apply if Bachmann wins the nomination, which is still very unlikely.

ejoch

I hope it's unlikely! Be another 1964 if she did.
I wonder why Huntsman opted out?

The comments to this entry are closed.

brain food

american politics

british politics

diversions

my other places

ads