« apple's evolution | Main | young, dumb, and in charge »

August 12, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5500eaa9788340120a53d7366970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference where does the mission end?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ejoch

Perhaps the question provides the answer. There are two separate issues interwined in Afghanistan- the threat to the national interest of the US and other countries, and, the problem of bringing good governance. Attempting to solve the former does not automatically mean you have to solve the latter (however desirable it seem to try - and for one example, bring some sort of better life to women in that country).
I've absolutely no idea though, even if the US and allies were to start dealing with the country from a purely self-interested POV, what could be done differently. It's not as if there's any kind of friendly autocrat there powerful enough - yet- to be given money and arms and left to it.

Scott

The AfPak phase of the mission will wind down when Afghanistan crosses the threshold into something approximating self-sustaining growth, when the government in Kabul is able to effectively police its own borders, and when movement across the Durand Line no longer poses a threat to the integrity of the Pakistani state.

What is so difficult to grasp about that?

The comments to this entry are closed.

brain food

american politics

british politics

diversions

my other places

ads